For a lot of students studying at IGNOU review, reviewing literature can be the most complicated part of the project work. This is particularly true for those working on an ignou mcom assignment, where academic depth is expected. However, instruction often feels limited. Students usually ask whether they require a summation of their books, amend journal articles, and simply gather quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that difference can change the quality of the entire project.
A review of literature is not intended to demonstrate the amount of material you’ve read. It is written to show how well you comprehend the works that are currently being done on the topic you’re researching and how your work fits in. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter since it showcases your ability to link the theory and research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before beginning any writing, it must be understood why this chapter is necessary in an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three main goals.
First, it demonstrates that the topic you selected is one that has been studied in the past and is of academic importance. Additionally, it can help you identify any gaps or limitations from previous studies. It also provides an outline for your research goals and methods.
Most students view this section as a formality, and duplicate content from previous projects or online sources. This practice usually leads to poor marks or even project rejection. IGNOU will require original content even when discussing existing studies.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. While doing so extremely basic explanations are too much to be avoided. For an ignou master’s degree project the literature review should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.
The expectation is to look over research papers, books, journals, reports, and occasionally, government publications that relate with your field. The primary focus should be on research relevant to your research area.
For instance, if your task is to study the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should focus on earlier studies concerning financial ratios financial performance, profitability analysis and risk evaluation.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
A common mistake made by students is selecting too many non-related sources. Quality matters more than quantity. If you are looking to build an ignou mcom business about fifteen to twenty good sources can be found if they are well chosen.
Excellent sources include academic journals reliable books from well-known writer, RBI publication, reports from the government, and university level research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.
Always opt for recent studies and ideally, from the last ten years. More recent studies can be added only if they’re fundamental in terms of.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
An organized chapter improves the readability and impact. Instead of writing random summaries of the work, break down chapters of a literature analysis into logical sections.
You can arrange the chapter based on themes, time period and methodology or even variables examined. For instance, one section might discuss studies on profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity and the third about operational effectiveness.
This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you’re not simply copying content, but actually analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The writing style is to be professional but easy. Avoid a lot of language and vocabulary. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.
Every study you review should be accompanied by the name of the author, the year of study, the purpose, method, and main findings. However, do not list them in a logical manner. Do your best to link one study to another.
In the case of discussing some research, you might describe how another researcher supported or refuted these findings. This type of analysis adds greater depth to your project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
A common error is writing the literature review like the kind of chapter in a textbook. Explaining basic concepts such as what accounting is and the meaning of management is not appropriate here unless directly linked to studies that have been done previously.
Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in an individual way. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas the copying of your review shows dependency.
Many students do not connect studies to their own research field. Each study you reference should be clearly connected to your research objectives.
Connection of Literature Review with Research Gap
One of most important outcomes of reviewing the literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU evaluators expect you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or where further study is needed.
After having discussed a myriad of studies you will notice that the majority of research focuses on large enterprises however small companies were absent. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, whereas primary data was limited.
This is why it’s the main reason for your project IGNOU MCOM project help (polyinform.com.ua) mcom. Without it, your plan could appear monotonous.
Use of Citations and Referencing
When writing a review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally follows APA style, but being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.
Every study to be discussed must be included in the list of references at the end of the project. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.
Do not use footnotes for literature reviews. In text citation works better and appears more professional in an ignou mcom project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students often ask how long the book review needs to be. There is no set amount to follow, but for an MCOM project this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred -two thousand words.
The length should be determined by the level of complexity of the topic. For a broad topic, you will need more studies, while a narrowly focused subject requires less but more extensive discussions.
Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analyses does not increase marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing this way,
Author A looked into the bank’s performance, and found positive results
Write as such
For example, author A conducted a study about bank performance with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased through better asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B, who emphasized the role of the efficiency of operations in enhancing returns for banks.
This approach emphasizes the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is valued in an ignou MCOM project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are rejected or delayed due to plagiarism in literature reviews. If you do refer to previously published studies, the style has to be distinctly yours.
Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. You can also rewrite your content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence can be better than perfect copied.
Final Review Before Submission
Before submitting your ignou MCOM project, go through the entire literature review. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, if it flows in a logical manner and whether the chapter naturally leads to your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes, your review on literature will be in the best path.
Closing Thoughts
Reviewing literature as part of an ignou master’s thesis is not easy at first particularly for students returning back to their academics after a period of. Once you realize that it is an analysis and connection, rather than memorizing, the job is a lot easier.
Do your best to read, think, and write in your unique voice. The result of your efforts will be apparent into the final version of your work. This often is the difference between the average submission and a powerful one.